Listing 1 - 10 of 17 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Quelle est la doctrine islamique du blasphème, injure faite à Dieu, à la religion et au Prophète ? Qu’en est-il de l’interdiction de la représentation figurée de Muhammad ? Peut-on croire ou abjurer publiquement en islam ? Se déclarer athée sans être poursuivi en justice, ostracisé ou livré à la vindicte populaire ? Peut-on penser librement ?Hamadi Redissi s’appuie sur une littérature méconnue pour restituer les débats sur ces questions qui ont animé les mondes sunnites et chiites du Moyen Âge à nos jours. Il identifie qui a le droit de s’exprimer en religion. Il dégage également les trois ordres qui régissent le domaine de l’expression : ce qui se dit et ne se dit pas, ce qui se laisse voir et ce qu’on retire au regard, ce qui se pense ou ne peut se penser.Au-delà du débat récurrent entre ceux qui estiment que l’islam est naturellement violent et ceux qui attribuent au seul islamisme les limites meurtrières à la liberté d’expression, cette nécessaire et passionnante enquête historique révèle que « deux islams » s’affrontent pratiquement sans discontinuité depuis l’âge médiéval. L’un, iconophobe, fanatique et belliqueux, a été transposé, et renforcé parfois, par l’État moderne. L’autre iconophile, tolérant et paisible, négocie le droit de s’exprimer, mais n’accorde pas tout.
Choose an application
The gripping story of an Azerbaijani journalist and writer who was condemned to death by an Iranian cleric for a blasphemous news article in 2006. Mohsen Kadivar debates the case with Muhammad Jawad Fazel.
Blasphemy (Islam) --- Apostasy --- Islam. --- Tağı, Rafiq,
Choose an application
Blasphemy (Islam) --- Apostasy --- Islam --- Tağı, Rafiq,
Choose an application
Censorship --- Blasphemy (Islam). --- Apostasy --- Religious aspects --- Islam. --- Islam.
Choose an application
Under the guise of Islamic law, the prophet Muhammad’s Islam, and the Qur’an, states such as Pakistan, Afghanistan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Bangladesh are using blasphemy laws to suppress freedom of speech. Yet the Prophet never tried or executed anyone for blasphemy, nor does the Qur’an authorize the practice. Asserting that blasphemy laws are neither Islamic nor Qur‘anic, Shemeem Burney Abbas traces the evolution of these laws from the Islamic empires that followed the death of the Prophet Muhammad to the present-day Taliban. Her pathfinding study on the shari’a and gender demonstrates that Pakistan’s blasphemy laws are the inventions of a military state that manipulates discourse in the name of Islam to exclude minorities, women, free thinkers, and even children from the rights of citizenship. Abbas herself was persecuted under Pakistan’s blasphemy laws, so she writes from both personal experience and years of scholarly study. Her analysis exposes the questionable motives behind Pakistan’s blasphemy laws, which were resurrected during General Zia-ul-Haq’s regime of 1977–1988—motives that encompassed gaining geopolitical control of the region, including Afghanistan, in order to weaken the Soviet Union. Abbas argues that these laws created a state-sponsored “infidel” ideology that now affects global security as militant groups such as the Taliban justify violence against all “infidels” who do not subscribe to their interpretation of Islam. She builds a strong case for the suspension of Pakistan’s blasphemy laws and for a return to the Prophet’s peaceful vision of social justice.
Blasphemy --- Blasphemy (Islam) --- Islamic ethics --- Freedom of speech --- Libel and slander --- Offenses against religion
Choose an application
Using the high-profile 2017 blasphemy trial of the former governor of Jakarta, Basuki 'Ahok' Tjahaja Purnama, as its sole case study, this book assesses whether Indonesia's liberal democratic human rights legal regime can withstand the rise of growing Islamist majoritarian sentiment. This book analyses whether a 2010 decision of Indonesia's Constitutional Court has rendered the liberal democratic human rights guarantees contained in Indonesia's 1945 Constitution ineffective. Key legal documents, including the indictment issued by the North Jakarta Attorney-General and General Prosecutor, the defence's 'Notice of Defence', and the North Jakarta State Court's convicting judgment are examined. The book shows how Islamist majoritarians in Indonesia have hijacked human rights discourse by attributing new, inaccurate meanings to key liberal democratic concepts. This has provided them with a human rights law-based justification for the prioritisation of the religious sensibilities and religious orthodoxy of Indonesia's Muslim majority over the fundamental rights of the country's religious minorities. While Ahok's conviction evidences this, and the book cautions that matters pertaining to public religion will remain a site of contestation in contemporary Indonesia for the foreseeable future.
Blasphemy --- Trials (Blasphemy) --- Blasphemy (Islam) --- Islam and politics --- Human rights --- Human rights --- Purnama, Basuki Tjahaja
Choose an application
Liberté d'expression --- Blasphème --- Laïcité --- Islam --- Freedom of speech. --- Blasphemy (Islam). --- Islam and secularism. --- Liberté d'expression. --- Islam.
Choose an application
L'image est aujourd'hui consommée comme si elle n'était qu'une sorte de milieu transparent d'une incontestable réalité. On a assassiné les dessinateurs de Charlie Hebdo comme si leurs caricatures n'étaient pas des dessins… « Je n'ai pas l'impression d'égorger quelqu'un avec un feutre », disait Charb… Le feutre de Charb disparaît ; la caricature disparaît en tant que telle.
Art --- Blasphemy (Islam) --- Caricatures and cartoons --- Iconoclasm --- Charlie Hebdo Attack, Paris, France, 2015 --- Terrorism --- Freedom of expression
Choose an application
Islam --- Journalism --- Sociology of culture --- anno 2000-2009 --- Caricatures and cartoons --- Muslims --- Protest movements --- Christianity and other religions --- Blasphemy (Islam) --- Political aspects --- Politics and government --- History --- Religious aspects --- Muḥammad, --- Morgenavisen Jyllands-posten --- Denmark --- Islamic countries --- Relations --- Caricatures and cartoons - Political aspects - Denmark --- Muslims - Denmark - Politics and government - 21st century --- Protest movements - Denmark - History - 21st century --- Caricatures and cartoons - Political aspects - Islamic countries --- Christianity and other religions - Islam - Case studies --- Blasphemy (Islam) - Case studies --- Caricatures and cartoons - Religious aspects --- Muḥammad, - Prophet, - -632 - Caricatures and cartoons --- Denmark - Relations - Islamic countries --- Islamic countries - Relations - Denmark --- geschiedenis --- beeldverhalen --- Muḥammad, - Prophet, - -632
Choose an application
L'affaire des caricatures de Mahomet au Danemark sert de point de départ à une réflexion sur le rôle qu'occupe la religion sur la scène politique. L'auteure montre comment ceux qui ont créé la crise internationale, des islamistes intégristes, ont été choisis comme interlocuteurs privilégiés par les autorités alors que ceux-ci n'ont pas entraîné derrière eux les musulmans ordinaires. ©Electre 2015
Freedom of the press --- Liberté de la presse --- Muhammad, --- Caricatures and cartoons --- Denmark --- Danemark --- Politics and government --- Politique et gouvernement --- Islam --- Muslims --- Blasphemy (Islam) --- East and West --- Political aspects --- Muḥammad, --- Morgenavisen Jyllands-posten --- Liberté de la presse --- Caricatures and cartoons. --- Islam - Denmark --- Muslims - Denmark --- Caricatures and cartoons - Political aspects - Denmark --- Muḥammad, - Prophet, - -632 - Caricatures and cartoons --- Muḥammad, - Prophet, - -632
Listing 1 - 10 of 17 | << page >> |
Sort by
|